Suzuki Volusia Forum banner

C50 Vs Twin Cam 07+ FatBoy?

1 reading
2K views 8 replies 6 participants last post by  FX4  
#1 ·
Please note, I really don't want this to become a stupid Harley Vs metric discussion.
I'm just thinking in the future, I will likely sell my C50 for a late model twim cam Fatboy. One with EFI and the corrected cam chain tensioners (hydraulic, much longer lasting).
What i'm asking is if anyone here has ridden and/or owned both and can shed some light on things such as maintenance cost between the two, performance, reliability, comfort, aftermarket parts etc.
I've wanted one since I was a kid but played it safe and have worked my way up in the motorcycle world starting on a 125cc bike, then a Virago 535cc and finally my C50 (800cc).
What sounds appealing on the Fatboy is:

1. Excellent styling, love the solid wheels
2. Better fit and finish, metal fenders etc
3. Twin Cam sound, especially with decent pipes
4. A 6th gear making motorway riding more comfortable and relaxed

But im still doing research so I dont know much about their reliability and what they're like day to day.
Thanks in advance
 
#2 · (Edited)
1. 07 First year of the Twinkie 96 - I believe the fat boy in 07 had the 88 which would still have the old style cam chain tensioners. They really were kind of anemic stock. Still, a lot more power than a C-50.
2. I probably would not touch anything made before 09 at this point in time.
3. The newer the bike is the more reliable it will be.
4. The HO103 really is the best Twinkie ever made but it only lasted three years before the M8 107 came out. The M8 107 is generally problem free and it has a ton of power.
5. My 07 SG which I rode for a little over 50k miles had quite a few problems. Knock on wood, my 16 has been problem free for 10k miles.
6. The solid wheels are known to be horrible in crosswind. I would really consider avoiding them.
7. 6th gear is usable after 2010. It was too tall to be useful in prior years. They regeared the bikes in 2010. And yes the six-speed makes for a relaxed ride all the way up to about 90MPH.
8. If you are looking at the Fatboy you really should take a look at the Road King. It's on the touring platform and will be a much more comfortable ride.
 
#7 ·
If you imagine a spoked wheel going at any kind of speed, how fast it would be rotating wouldnt let any air pass through anyway.

Not according to the scientific testing done for bicycle racing. I'm assuming it can be transposed to motorcycles.


https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien...7375777638fc08e9e036e8c21df2e0ab&pid=1-s2.0-S1877705812016189-main.pdf&_valck=1


"spoke wheels, because they are lighter, more maneuverable, better at climbing, and aren’t so easily caught by crosswinds, are ideal for outdoor races that are curvy, hilly, or long. That’s why you don’t see disc wheels in the mountains of the Tour de France."
 
#8 ·
To be fair spokes weigh less than a solid wheel on bicycles which is most important.
Im not convinced, never heard of a fatboy rider crashing because a crosswind blew him off the road. They're heavy bikes and in wind conditions like that you should really be on the ball and correcting yourself. In very strong winds it can move me on the c50 but a bit of countersteering sorts that out. Definitely not a good enough reason to not buy one, plus solid wheels are more reliable and less maintenance than spoked, which need periodic tightening or replacing if one snaps, and youre stuck with tubed tires.